Once upon a time an established writer
told me I
must write stories that change people’s lives. I MUST. Bite
me. I beg to differ. But the recent debates regarding ‘Feminism in Romance’
over at Australian Women’s Writers (
http://www.australianwomenwriters.com/2012/03/in-defence-of-books-written-by-women.html
) and the success of 50 Shades of Grey has got me thinking about where we’re
going with all this. What is the future of Romance Writing? Should I be
attempting to write the next great Women’s Movement Bible? Because I can tell
you now, I don’t have it in me. I’m simply not that deep. But then nor is 50
Shades of Grey and its filling up the shelves in department stores like nobody’s
business. So what are readers after?
I believe it’s a story that speaks to
them, heart and soul. It’s the tale that captures their imagination and carries
them far, far away. There was a poster on my classroom wall in High School that
said finishing a good book is like losing a good friend. Isn’t that what a
reader is searching for?
But back to the serious stuff. Is romance reflecting the times? Does it
encourage unequal relationships? Does it present us with disempowered, choice-less
heroines waiting to be rescued? Is it focused on sex and an emotional rush
rather than more literary minded, mental pursuits? Does it matter? Well... yes.
It does. But only in so much as these issues are fundamentally important.
Should they dictate what we buy and read? No. Never. But the Golden Rule
here: If the heroine is too stupid to
live and the hero an ass in the making then it’s likely to sink in a
nano-second. Go read the discussions over at AWW2012. They can express it far
more eloquently than me.
Still here? Okay. Let’s start with - Is it focused on sex and an
emotional rush rather than more literary minded pursuits? Answer: Who cares? Seriously?
Why should feminism be boxed into being literary minded and cerebral? Men for
centuries told stories about how reason was more important than fluffy
emotions. They often swilled wine and wore weird hats while they did it. Usually
this division was justified by associating men with reason and women with said
fluff. Such stuff lingers. If we decide we want to take emotion by the horns
and run with it then all power to us. Or am I missing something?
Does Romance present us with disempowered, choice-less heroines waiting
to be rescued? Well, it’s a rather broad genre with many, many contributors,
far and wide. For every kick-butt self-rescuing princess you’re going to get a
sappy, suffering waif who probably would have been evicted long since by a hero
with any sense. And the ones in-between? The closer to normal women who are
trying to be strong and get along? Well, they’re like most women actually
are... but with a buff, chiselled hero ready to fall at their feet given the
right wind conditions. Lucky things. It wouldn’t be so useful if every romantic
protagonist was Wonder Woman. It would get dull for starts. Give the guy less
to do for seconds. And it wouldn’t really empower anyone, now then, would it?
If everyone was fantastic all the time then what’s the fuss about? But should
Ms Average represent the issues and concerns of the modern age? Authenticity
wise, I’m going to lean towards the yes side of things. Does the Author owe us
a lecture on safe sex however? No. But that doesn’t mean we aren’t doing the
right thing by discussing and raising awareness of these issues through debates
like the one over at AWW2012...
Does it encourage unequal relationships? Let us reflect upon Pride and
Prejudice. When Darcy first proposes to Elizabeth, if she had accepted then and
there it would have been an unequal relationship. He all but believes himself
bewitched. He’s been smacked upside the head with lust. It isn’t real love at
this stage. Not until he respects her and she respects him do we have our Happy
Ever After. Is this balance of power reflected across the board in romance? We
can only hope. But satisfaction will not be guaranteed if it isn’t. Let’s give
the reader some credit. We know a forever after when we see one. We also know a
‘Well, she’s bound to be just his starter wife...’ when it falls across our
bedside table. Or Kindle.
All of what we have discussed thus far is stuff that happens in the
books. How about the process? Romance books are by and large written by women,
for women, and f*ck what men think. Doesn’t this strike you as feminist? Women
exploring fantasies and heady, convoluted tales of love, lust and passion, in
whatever form they so please.
So, to sum up. Does romance impact negatively in any way shape or form
on how women are thinking? No. Women can think for themselves. We can. So
there.
DISCLAIMER: This is what happens when you drink vodka and have drunken debates with your partner the philosopher. Avoid vodka and never, ever marry a philosopher. You've been warned. And sorry about the length of the post. It won't happen again.